© Laurent Dubois 2001
Against pop-ups, free and really convivial:
The Concep-T, with verbal and reasoning-abstract concepts subtests, is a power-type IQ test intended to measure crystallized intelligence and power of reasoning with abstract concepts.
A non expected but pertinent answer will be taken into account in the raw score, and weighted according to its degree of quality.
There is no time limit; material help allowed: books, calculator, computer, internet…, corrections and additions are not accepted; no discussion with others, no help from anyone in any way.
Requisites : logic, imagination, shrewdness, minimal general knowledge, and a very very good sense of observation. Send your answers to email@example.com
Or to the following address: Laurent Dubois, rue Beaulieusart, 148, Fontaine-L’Evêque, 6140, Belgium.
Please include your name, age, gender, e-mail address, and native language. If relevant, please list scores on previously-taken IQ tests, along with the names of the tests. It’s important to normalize the “Concep-T test”. Thanks for your comprehension.
The Concep-T TesT is an admission test for the SIGMA Society and potentially for several other societies (Cerebrals, Glia, Poetic Genius, Pi, Mega…).
See the PROJECTED NORMS
See the SCORING SCALE.
The correction is free!
Read carefully the following warning !
You have to choose the most basic, the most general and the most precise solution. To avoid confusion, don’t “point out” the solution; write or draw it completely! If there is the most little part of subjectivity or interpretation in your answer, this is not the good answer!
A potentially infinite series is indicated by the dots; the hyphens indicate the number of elements (not asked) after the question mark; otherwise, there is logically nothing else possible after the last element.
The numbering of the items doesn’t belong to the items!
Principle of an analogy: “black : white :: true : false” must be read as this: white is to black as false is to true.
Principle of an analogy: “black : white :: true : false” must be read as this: white is to black as false is to true
a) Chronoscope : Time :: 916 : ?
b) Nowhere : Now :: Never : ?
c) Stalemate : Automate :: Mate : ?
d) Corpore: Naso :: Mens : ?
e) Effect : Intention :: Action : ?
f) Action : Reaction :: Imitation : ?
g) Sphere : Concentric : : Original : ?
h) Before before : Before :: Before after : ?
i) Correct : Eror :: Incorrect : ?
j) Bath : Pinball :: Eureka : ?
k) Analogy : :: :: Equation : ?
l) / : Fraction :: : ?
m) Analogy : :: :: What : ?
n) : :: All : ?
o) BC : BB :: Omega : ?
p) Newton : Cancel : : Shakespeare : ?
q) : : : : : : : : ?
r) Whole : Whole : … : : Hole : : : Hole : ?
s) Part : Part: Part: Part:(...) :: Whole : ?
2) c. F.
a) Common feature: -Oxygen -15 -Zero -Ring
b) Common feature –Point –Force –Factor –Suit
c) Common feature: –Film –Rays –Cross –Times
d) Common feature: -100 -Language -300000 -Ut
e) Common feature: -Sonata -Tale -Rite -Indian
Which is the missing word ?
- - - -
? a ? i ? d ? o ? e ? m ? r ? n ? l ? p
6) Which is the odd one out ?
a) Word b) Tyrannosaur c) Here d) Posted e) Abv. f) True g) In-------- h) Penultimate i) Last
7) Which is the odd one out ?
a) Adam b) Ambiguity c) Trinity d) Tesseract e) Planck f) Pentagon g) Fly h) Week i) Spider
E = ERAT
D = DEMONSTRANDUM
QED = *QUOD ERAT DEMONSTRANDUM
* You have to say what is coming behind the second question mark
* QUOD ERAT DEMONSTRANDUM = which was to be demonstrated
What words are you reading now ?
(choose only one of the following propositions; your answer can’t be contradictory at the semantic level and must be the most general at the semantic level)
a) Any word you like b) None c) Plane d) The solution I have just chosen e) Joker f) What words are you reading now
Let’s try to demonstrate that a Demonstration Ab Absurdo is not absurd.
Consider that a Demonstration Ab Absurdo (DAA) is absurd
This is contradictory with the premises since we use what is to be demonstrated to make the demonstration (petitio principii)
Thus we can demonstrate only directly that a DAA is not absurd
But then, we have demonstrated Ab Absurdo that the demonstration has to be direct
Since we can not make the hypothesis that a DAA is absurd, in other words since that is absurd to consider that a DAA is absurd, DAA demonstrates his validity sui generis, i.e. in the most direct way
This demonstration is: (choose only one of the following propositions)
a) Absurd b) Beautiful c) Correct d) I don’t know e) Incomplete f) Which has to be demonstrated
This sentence ends by: “ This sentence ends by: “ This sentence ends by: “ This sentence ends by…”””
Which of the following words can not be referred to this sentence?
a) Perpetual b) Fractal c) Auto reference d) Cycle e) Syllogism f) Transfinis g) Retroaction
A deduction is built on hypothesis
An hypothesis has to be constantly checked
A constantly checked hypothesis is an induction
A deduction is an induction
This syllogism is: (choose only one of the following propositions)
a) Valid b) False c) Incomplete d) True e) Invalid f) Dangerous
Supposition: the Time Travel is possible
Condition: the Time travel is instantaneous
Precision: the specificity of the Time is “succession”!
Which of the following conclusions are incorrect?
a) All the past and all the future exist simultaneously
b) Pure determinism
c) Time and time travel are contradictory
d) All that is possible is already realized somewhere
e) Time is an illusion
f) Each of this words and your answer are predetermined
g) Time Travel is possible “now” in a certain future
h) All potential is actual
i) All the Time is accomplished somewhere
7) time’s arrow
Physicists assess that there is no absolute, privileged time’s arrow
Consequently, we can imagine, in our future, a universe whom time’s arrow is opposite to our own time’s arrow
Suppose that the Time Travel is possible
How to escape to the temporal collision?
a) Time travel in the past
b) Time travel in the future
c) Trip in another dimension
d) No issue
e) To say one’s prayers
f) To send a letter of protest with the designer of the 916